This is the old version of PriceSpy. Return to the new PriceSpy site

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (PC)

 Add to list  Compare
Detailed information Toggle full text Product rating (4.79)
  •  
    Click on a star to rate
You must be logged in to leave a review

  • User reviews from other countries

    Sorted by date

  • Terrible
    3 years ago
    Updated: 3 years ago
    Crap Game, lousy graphics, anti-Russian American propaganda lubricate the story.
  • Good
    3 years ago
    Updated: 3 years ago
    Well fun but not as MW2
  • Good
    4 years ago
    Updated: 4 years ago
    Still good action. The graphics may seem a bit dated but for the low price (56 - digital download) it's ok :)
    Singleplayer, I can not comment on because I have not even started: P
  • Excellent
    6 years ago
    Updated: 6 years ago
    Very good game!
  • Barely acceptable
    6 years ago
    Updated: 6 years ago
    Have done as good as MW and MW2. MW3 is totallt done only earn COD fans money for activision.
  • Perfect
    7 years ago
    Updated: 7 years ago
    one of the best games made
  • Very Poor
    7 years ago
    Updated: 7 years ago
    Fraud!

    * Everything is copied from the previous games
    * It has been deliberately destroyed / neglected to patch the predecessor MWF2 that no longer work at all online. They would thus get you to buy 3rd
    * Cheaters everywhere on the servers.
  • Very Poor
    7 years ago
    Updated: 7 years ago
    Are you looking for a change in comparison to previous versions such as MW1 and MW2, then do not buy this. Same game, same old graphics, new mappack only. It seems that Activision is only looking to milk his cash cow as best as possible year after year while spending as little as possible on improvements and updates. My advice> Try something else. Glad I won this game and did not spend a dime for it, because it is not worth it if you played previous versions and / or have them at home.
  • Poor
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Just the same as MW2, should have been sold as an expansion to MW2. Not worth over SEK 150.

    Buy BF3 instead if you have not already done so.
  • Acceptable
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    The game was totally ok nothing special, the campaign was totally okay, Multiplayer is type 90% identical to that of Mw2 so no big deal. If a company is to make a third sequel that must be unique for it to maintain a good standard. The game may 5av10 for that it feels more like a cheap copy of MW2, almost as good to buy MW2 if you like multiplayer, if you want to follow the story then it will be Modern Warfare third
  • Decent
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    MW3 is a good FPS, but not a new game but rather an extra campain to MW2. What is a shame is that it's a bit short and a bit too linear and structured. One does not really intended but just know all the time where to run, where to croucha, strafa etc..
    For a few hundred, it's an OK price. You can warm up a bit in the single player and then reveal loose in MP.
    Regarding the graphics in the game so I do not think it is the same as MW2, it feels strangely worse, the textures and the depth is worse, the feeling is "softer" and with a lot of motion blur. But the strange thing is that it varies between different courses, sometimes it feels really luxurious and stylish, sometimes "console-like" with bad details.

    To summarize, an OK game if you can buy it cheap and realize that it is a continuation of MW2 at all.
  • Terrible
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    This was not worth the 600kr I bought it on steam. Cod 4 huh better (I got it) Battlefield 3 is the obvious winner if you compare these games!
  • Terrible
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    the game is awesome but it can not play full of cheaters and MW3 does nothing about it. buy no more cod games to come so they learn and do something about all the little kids who sit and cheating.
  • Poor
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    For those who are obsessed with graphics so CoD has never been a good choice. I loved CoD 4 and Modern warfare 2

    It is obvious that Vince Zampella and Jason West were fired. Played single player first as I always do and must say that it feels very bad. Approximately the same level as battlefields singleplayer.

    CoD 4 and Mw2 Had awesome single players as they lived themselves in. Here it just feels like a bunch of half-incoherent mission.

    Regarding multiplayer, it's nice that they have put in dedicated servers again. But mapsen feels extremely poorly made, spawnsen are bad (spawn on the enemy all the time). General hitdetection is entirely devoted to the forest.

    Actually it was not so unexpected that this game would be so bad. Infinity Ward lost 46 employees when they kicked them real brains behind the old cod games.

    Let's hope that the new respawn entertainment comes with something good in the near future!
  • Terrible
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    After sitting with BF3 for a while I got this. Could not understand that the game would be so bad.

    Lack any sense. Movements are stiff, etc. It felt like you might as well keep playing on MW2 for third place feels a little less thought out.

    Have yet to find anything positive to say about the game .. If I can take it up again and IF I find something I will get back.
  • Poor
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Unfortunately, no fun, think COD series era is over.
  • Very good
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Pretty nice game, could have been more tracks though!
    Really fun to sit and play with their friends!
  • Perfect
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Same graphics as mw2?
    obviously because it is a continuation of mw2, jesus ..

    then I do not think it's the same graphics, but the fairest game made tbh.
    like both bf3 and mw3, however, they have become more hours to mw3.
  • Excellent
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    I'm COD fans so this is the cruel game but so many hacker.
  • Terrible
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Total breaking cheated in mutliplayer, and that's because of the multiplayer that I play .. Stops playing now and regret your purchase and will never buy anything that InfinityWard developed ..

    So: NOT buy this game .. If you will not cheat then? Then you can buy and destroy the rest. : (
  • Terrible
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    worst cod hititls
  • Poor
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Locked and Patok for low FoV adapted for the console, dedicated servers are totally disabled and no feasible solution exists. Nothing new to say at all almost, Patok too much money spent on marketing rather than development. It shows!

    Redo, do it right!
  • Very good
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Clearly ok game, but obviously depending on what expectations you have.

    If you expect "more of the same", ie new features, new courses, continuing SP campaign, more spec ops so you'd think the game is very good.

    If you expect a new game like BF3, you become probably disappointed. But the question is why you do it, all (?) Know that it is the same engine as MW2, so why one expects better graphics? And why buy one game at all with such expectations?

    Payed 299: - Expert, ok price for what you get.

    Have no problem with "music that drowns out all sound."

    Do not play MP because all the kids who cheat, etc..
  • Acceptable
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Single player portion is good, the multiplayer so good, I think mw2 developers made single and a few other multi.
  • Perfect
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Eat BF3 for brekky in SP mode .... far superior game! Buy!
  • Perfect
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    BF3 eats for breakfast in SP mode!

    has just driven over 2 hours yet, but damn what it's good. Still stands as the best FPS game. Thought BF2 was the best then and had rikgt high expectations but damn. did not think you could go back in evolution as game developers.

    Just saying BUY! BUY! BUY!
  • Perfect
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    This game is for all who like cods gameplay. Antigen love to it or you hate it.
  • Very Poor
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Really not something to cheer about
  • Terrible
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    A copy of MW2: (
    It has the same graphics no difference at all except that it begins at the opponent all the time and so it has a couple of new tracks.
    Multiplayer quire is lousy when it takes type 2 minutes to just get into a game. Servers lags quite often and you do not always hit to kill someone.

    5 times in a row I have not got into a server) x

    Warning do not buy!
  • Excellent
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Nice imo, however, is the first cod I'm playing, so basically have nothing to compare to.
  • Poor
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Key difference graphics wise, the single player is too short, had hoped for more stealth missions and a LONG campaign, but not said nicke. Survival mode is fun and challenging, however, has not tested the multiplayer mode yet, will probably not be there at all.

    If you have people to play co-op with so get the game, otherwise, I recommend you to spend the money on Battlefield 3 instead.

    MW3 had in general no major WoW feeling you got in fourth grade, just gets worse and worse. Typical boring gun and run where he's seen first die first, will be a game that gathers dust on shelves values ??above.

    Has also passed out singleplayer and was displeased that it ended after about 5 hours, at least 50 hours is a good and acceptable figure. Everything is predictable and nothing new right. One star for the single player, two for co-op.
  • Very Poor
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    A word of caution to those who want to run the campaign but have interfered in the previous games in the series had music often drowns out all other sounds. The problem is back here. I gave up the first mission to the feeling of presence was so bad. The sound does a lot for a game, this lowers the singleplayer.
  • Terrible
    8 years ago
    Updated: 8 years ago
    Now you understand why no one got reviewa PC version before release. 600kr for a mappack to an outdated way of all games.
    This was bad, really bad. As an X boxspel with Nitendografik. Have played all COD and this is without doubt the worst, and by a good margin.
    Graphics 4/10
    Sound 3/10
    Feeling 2/10
    MP 1/10 Lagy, campfliendly, cheat friendly
    That they are sold to PC is clean lureri if you ask me. It is a pure consollspel that should have 15 years maxåldergräns.
    Buy NOT until you tried it. Bought for 600 SEK on Steam and it is 550 kr too expensive for this class of games. Too bad you can not sell shit.
    + Because it started at releasdagen but in this case it had kvittat.
    + To be received with COD4 if overstocked as it is a pretty damn good game that still holds true today.